|
FDA Told
Abortion Drug May Suppress Immune System, Cause Deaths
by
Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
May 11, 2006
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) --
While the
joint FDA-CDC meeting got somewhat off topic in its discussion of the
deaths of five women in the last three years form the dangerous RU 486
abortion drug, some scientists told the federal agencies they think the
abortion drug is suppressing women's immune systems -- creating an
environment where a normally nonlethal bacteria causes death.
The
abortion drug has already been linked to the bacteria Clostridium sorreli
and one researcher pointed to immune system problems as the reason for the
abortion deaths.
Dr. Ralph
Miech, an associate professor of pharmacology at Brown University, has
already done some of the most comprehensive research on the problem. As a
panelist at the meeting, he told officials the abortion drug suppresses
the immune system and increases the possibility for a lethal infection.
That's
also the opinion of Dr. Randall O'Bannon, the director of research for the
National Right to Life Committee.
O'Bannon
said that suggestions that the presence of the bacteria in a woman's
vaginal tract is a cause of the abortion deaths is unlikely because the
bacteria is already present in the vaginas of 10 percent of women, and
they are not dying from lethal infections.
"The best
explanation for this sudden spate of deaths among RU-486 patients appears
to involve the immunosuppressant properties of the abortion pill RU-486,"
O'Bannon explained.
"A woman's
immune system is normally capable of protecting her from deadly bacteria
like Clostridium sordellii, but RU-486 appears to compromise her immune
system, so that it is unable to help her fight off such infections," Dr.
O'Bannon explained.
Other
researchers, including Dr. Sandra Kweder of the FDA's for Drug Evaluation
and Research's Office of New Drugs, had another theory.
She said
the second part of the abortion drug causes contractions to expel the body
of the dead baby and could increase a woman's susceptibility of getting
the bacteria in her uterus.
Dr. James
McGregor, an obstetrics professor at the University of Colorado Health
Sciences Center, agreed that the problems are sufficient to warrant
limiting the use of the abortion drug or pulling it from the market
entirely.
"I
recommend we reduce or eliminate mifepristone, or at least consider that,"
McGregor said, and indicate that chemical abortions were much more
dangerous for women than surgical abortions.
O'Bannon
agreed and said that claims from abortion advocates that the drug is safe
because only six women have died in the United States when 500,000 have
used the drug are misstating the facts.
He
indicated the "figures are based on sales from the distributor to
prescribers, not on field tallies of actual uses by patients, so uses may
be grossly inflated."
Related web sites:
National Right to Life Committee -
http://www.nrlc.org |
|
Abortion Drug
Causes Eight Deaths, Pro-Life Lawmakers Want Sales Stopped
|
by Steven
Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
February 1, 2006
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) --
Members of
Congress held a press conference on Wednesday to discuss new research
showing eight women internationally have died from using the dangerous RU
486 abortion drug, including five in the United States. More than 840
women have also experienced sometimes life-threatening complications from
using the drug.
Maryland
Congressman Roscoe Bartlett was joined by more than a dozen members of
Congress who are backing his effort to suspend sales of the RU 486
abortion drug while its safety is investigated.
Bartlett
has introduced HR 1079, otherwise known as Holly's Law. It's named after
Holly Patterson, a California teenager who died from using the abortion
drug she received at a Planned Parenthood facility.
"Today, we
present stronger evidence that RU-486 kills and injures women," Bartlett
said.
The new
study, co-authored by Dr. Donna J. Harrison and Dr. Margaret M. Gary
appears in the February 2006 issue of The Annals of Pharmacothrapy.
The study
focuses on complications from RU 486 abortions contained in reports to the
FDA from Danco Laboratories, the maker of the abortion drug, filed between
September 2000 and July 2005.
They
analyzed 607 reports between September 2000 and September 2004 and found
five deaths and 64 life-threatening and 224 severe events.
Harrison noted that 237 women hemorrhaged, with 42 losing
over half of their blood volume. Some 68 women required blood transfusions
and four women went into the kind of septic shock that killed others.
Reacting
to the new studies, Holly's father Monty Patterson said, "How can we
expect a teenager to figure out if she's beyond the so-called normal side
effects of an RU-486
abortion to serious adverse events?"
Congressman Bartlett said Congress should suspend sales of the abortion
drug because Danco is not a responsible manufacturer.
"The FDA
rarely pulls drugs from the market. Responsible manufacturers pull drugs
from the market," he explained. However, RU-486's manufacturer, Danco, is
a shell company. Its only product is RU-486. That is why Congress must
act."
Bartlett
also pointed out that many reports of women who have been injured from the
abortion drug aren't surfacing because they're not always telling doctors
that they took the abortion pills in the first place.
"It is
unacceptable for the FDA to expose women to the risk of serious injury,
especially deadly infections whose symptoms are similar to any RU-486
abortion when we have
documented cases of medical professionals who have failed to diagnose
them," he said.
Other
members of Congress including Rep. Joe Pitts of Pennsylvania, Rep. Peter
Hoekstra of Michigan, and Rep. Chris Smith of New Jersey appeared at the
press conference and urged strong support for the bill.
TAKE
ACTION: Contact your member of Congress and urge strong support for
Holly's Law. You can find contact information for any Congressman at
http://www.house.gov. |
|
RU 486
causes rare bacterial infections |
|
Providence, RI (LifeNews.com) -- A Brown University researcher says
the abortion drug RU 486 causes rare bacterial infections in women that
are not usually seen anywhere else. An article scheduled to appear in the
September issue of The Annals of Pharmacotherapy confirms the drug is
responsible for the women's deaths.
During a pill-induced abortion, women take a two-part drug process.
The
first drug, mifepristone, works by blocking the effects of progesterone,
shutting off nutrition to the placenta and the developing baby. The second
drug, misoprostol, is a cancer drug that is misused to cause contractions
and expel the deceased unborn child.
Professor Ralph P. Miech, MD, Ph.D. writes that the antiprogesterone
effects of mifepristone also cause changes in the cervix that allow C.
sordellii, a common vaginal bacteria, to enter the cervical canal.
"C.
sordellii thrives in this low-oxygen environment and derives nutrition
from the decaying fetal tissue," Miech explains. Meanwhile, mifepristone
produces other hormonal effects, known as antiglucocorticoid actions.
Dr.
Miech proposes two models showing how those hormonal effects prevent the
woman's immune system from fighting off the bacteria and, in fact, may
help it spread. That combination can result in a septic shock -- the kind
that killed the women taking the Mifeprix abortion pills.
The
FDA and Danco Laboratories, maker of the abortion drug, report that five
women have died in the United States, four of them from California. Three
of the women were known to have the C. sordellii bacteria in their bodies
when they died.
According to Miech, C. sordellii infections are "rare outside of
mifepristone use" and are particularly dangerous because women do not show
any telltale signs of infection or fever and tenderness upon examination.
"[I]t appears that the mechanisms of mifepristone action favor the
development of infection that leads to septic shock," Miech explained.
That's the same conclusion Frank Gentle, supervising coroner investigator
who looked into Holly Patterson's death, reached when he performed her
autopsy.
He said "septic shock, due to endomyometritis (inflammation) due to
therapeutic, drug-induced abortion," caused Patterson's death.
Endomyometritis is an inflammation of the mucous membrane lining of the
uterus.
In
other words, "the abortion caused inflammation, which caused the shock,
which caused her death," Gentle said.
The
FDA, in late 2004, required Danco to improve it's black-box warning label
to indicate that bacterial infections may occur and that women taking the
abortion drugs may show no signs of infection.
Earlier this month, and weeks after another woman died from using the
abortion drug, Danco announced it would finally implement the new warning
labels and alert doctors and emergency room directors about the potential
problems.
Danco also denied that the abortion drug played any role in the women's
deaths.
Miech is a professor in the Department of Molecular Pharmacology,
Physiology, and Biotechnology at Brown Medical School.
Related web sites:
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy -
http://www.theannals.com |
RU 486 Maker Admits Abortion Drug Not "Safer" Than
Surgical Abortion
|
Plattsburgh, NY -- The Food and Drug Administration's approval of the
dangerous abortion drug RU 486 for use in the United States was hailed by
abortion advocates. They claimed the abortion drug would make abortion,
safer, more convenient, and more available -- if also more profitable --
than surgical abortions.
Data thus far suggests the abortion drug has been as widely used as
abortion advocates hoped or expected. Now, in a startling admission by the
drug's maker, it may not be safe either.
Dr. Richard Hausknecht, the medical director of Danco, the company that
makes Mifepristone, also know as RU-486, spoke about the abortion drug at
a news conference Friday at Northern Adirondack Planned Parenthood in
Plattsburgh, New York.
The pills are "the other modality for medical abortion as compared to
surgical abortion," Hausknecht said. "We don't know (RU-486) is safer, but
we do know that it is as safe."
RU-486 can be used up to seven weeks into the pregnancy and -- combined
with a drug that spurs contractions -- causes an abortion. The maker of
the second drug has written a letter to doctors saying the drug is being
misused in association with an abortion.
Hausknecht, Planned Parenthood and other abortion advocates see RU-486 as
a non-invasive, more private way to conduct an abortion. Some women,
Hausknecht said, see using the Mifepristone pills as "more natural" -- a
feeling Hausknecht said he doesn't quite understand. The abortion drug
involves a multi-step process requiring repeat visits to an abortion
facility.
"Other women are afraid they will see something come out of their bodies"
and opt for the surgical abortion, Hausknecht said.
However, Dr. John Middleton, district director for New York Right to Life,
said RU-486 "has a bad record. I think the literature is quite clear."
Middleton said a problem with an abortion brought about by drugs, versus
the surgical abortion, is its two-stage process, which he says "drags it
out" and makes the abortion more dangerous.
The drug is another part of the larger debate surrounding the moral and
legal issues of abortions. For Middleton and his colleagues, the real
issue is about what the abortion pills do.
"I believe it is a child. It's only a medicine to kill a child. I don't
favor anything ... that does away with a child."
Middleton was a psychotherapist before abortion became legal and saw women
who had had abortions. He said he has counseled women suffering "despair"
or "guilt" after an abortion.
"The feeling is very intense. Sometimes they don't know what the feeling
is about. When they come to grips with it, when they come to grips with
their soul," they feel better, Middleton said.
"I've been in practice for 53 years" in family and individual counseling,
Middleton said, and his position on abortion "gets reinforced every time I
go through it."
--
The Pro-Life Infonet is a daily compilation of pro-life news and
information. To subscribe, send the message "subscribe" to:
infonet-request@prolifeinfo.org. Infonet is sponsored by Women and
Children First (http://www.womenandchildrenfirst.org).
For more pro-life info visit http://www.prolifeinfo.org
and for questions or additional information email
ertelt@prolifeinfo.org
|
|
Top of Page
Home |
|